Competitive Advantages
 

1.    Other Magnetic Fuel Savers

Although some magnetic fuel saver products have appeared in the market over the past few years, they have mainly failed due to major flaws in the design and failure to deliver substantial fuel savings.

The conventional fuel savers mainly failed due the following reasons:

1.   The fuel line had to be cut in some cases.

2.   Cumbersome installation only through a qualified mechanic.

3.   Bulky and difficult to mount.

4.   Simple North – South pole design.

5.   Poor magnetic material and gauss levels.

6.   No real savings on diesel or gasoline fuel.

7.   Different models for different engine sizes.

 
The EPS fuel saver unit on the other hand was designed and manufactured to resolve all these issues. The unique 3 tier technology offers very high savings in fuel consumption as well as works equally well on types of fuel and engine sizes.

2.    Chemical Based Additives

A number of chemical based engine treatments are available in the market and claim to reduce fuel consumption as well as CO emissions. However these chemicals are designed to clean the fuel channel and their affect deteriorates with time, usually within 3 -6 months. After this period, consumers are generally required to use the treatments again, in order to reduce the fuel consumption. The EPS fuel saver however rectifies the root cause of the problem that generates toxic emissions and causes  up to 30% of the fuel to be wasted in the form of carbon deposits.

 
Test Results
Tests have been carried out in laboratories in accordance to the rules and regulations valid in the countries of the European Community, based on the DIN/ISO norms as used in the testing facilities.

Several tests have been conducted on specialised independent test benches. Tests were conducted on a wide spectrum of older and newer cars.

The values before and after are to be understood as before and after mounting the EPS Fuel Saver.